How was Dr. Gil's malpractice brought to light?

The scenario reflects how surveillance footage can play a crucial role in uncovering malpractice in a medical context. This method allows investigators to visually capture actions or behaviors that may indicate wrongdoing. For instance, if Dr. Gil were observed conducting procedures improperly or exhibiting negligence during patient care, the footage would provide concrete evidence that could corroborate allegations of malpractice.

Surveillance footage offers an objective view of events, which can be pivotal in shedding light on actions that might be disputed or misrepresented through other reporting methods. In cases involving medical professionals, such footage can help clarify circumstances surrounding a patient's treatment and reveal whether the standard of care was met. By demonstrating these facts, surveillance footage can serve as a vital piece of evidence in legal proceedings, thus revealing any malpractice involved.

The other methods, while potentially useful in different contexts, may not provide the same immediate visual evidence that surveillance does. Forensic audits and official court documents rely on written records and may not capture the nuanced actions caught on video. Confidential whistleblower reports can be vital in highlighting issues but might lack the corroboration that visual proof can provide.