What does Robert Epstein argue regarding fingerprints?

Robert Epstein argues that fingerprints have not been proven reliable for individual identification. This perspective highlights concerns about the validity and accuracy of fingerprint analysis, particularly focusing on the potential for human error in the interpretation process and the lack of rigorous scientific standards. Epstein's position draws attention to the need for more comprehensive validation studies to support the claims of uniqueness and reliability typically associated with fingerprint evidence. This skepticism prompts a discussion about the broader implications for forensic science and the judicial system, emphasizing that reliance on such evidence without robust scientific backing can lead to wrongful convictions and undermine the pursuit of justice.