What type of evidence was used against Dr. Gil in relation to his autopsy practices?

The use of video evidence against Dr. Gil in relation to his autopsy practices is significant because it provides a direct, visual representation of his actions and techniques during the autopsy process. Video can capture nuances in behavior, procedures, and environments that might not be as clearly conveyed through other forms of evidence. This type of evidence tends to have a strong impact in court, as it allows jurors to see the actions firsthand, which can either support or discredit the claims made against him regarding his methods. The ability to observe procedures in real time can also highlight deviations from accepted practices, thereby bolstering the case for or against the adequacy of his autopsy work. Other forms of evidence, while valuable, may not offer the same level of clarity or immediacy that video can provide in establishing a timeline or demonstrating specific actions.