Which of the following could directly result from inaccuracies in autopsy findings?

Legal challenges and appeals in court can directly result from inaccuracies in autopsy findings because such inaccuracies can compromise the integrity of the evidence used in legal proceedings. When autopsies determine cause of death, any mistakes or misinterpretations can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals, prompting the affected parties—be they the prosecution, defense, or families of victims—to seek legal recourse. This can manifest as appeals against convictions based on flawed forensic evidence or even civil suits for wrongful death, highlighting the necessity of accurate forensic practices in upholding justice.

In contrast, heightened public trust in the justice system, increased support for forensic professionals, and improvements in coroner training programs are generally more indirect outcomes. While they may be beneficial developments that arise from addressing forensic inaccuracies, they do not directly result from specific instances of inaccuracy in autopsy findings. Legal challenges and appeals are immediate consequences of those inaccuracies, showcasing how critical accurate autopsy results are within the judicial process.