Which of the following is NOT a type of evidence?

Enhance your skills with the Criminal Investigation Test. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions—each paired with hints and explanations. Prepare thoroughly for your exam!

The correct choice identifies 'Factual' as not being a recognized type of evidence in the context of criminal investigations. Evidence is typically classified into several categories, and the common types include circumstantial, testimonial, and physical evidence.

Circumstantial evidence refers to information that implies a fact or event without directly proving it, often requiring inference. For example, if there is a witness who saw someone near a crime scene at the time of the crime, that’s circumstantial evidence.

Testimonial evidence involves statements made by witnesses under oath, providing personal observations regarding the events. This could include what someone saw or heard concerning the crime.

Physical evidence, on the other hand, consists of tangible items that can be collected and analyzed, such as fingerprints, weapons, or DNA samples. This type of evidence can play a crucial role in establishing facts in a case since it can be directly linked to the crime or the suspect.

In contrast, the term 'factual' does not categorize evidence but rather refers to things that are true or can be proven. While factual statements can support various types of evidence, they do not themselves constitute evidence used in investigative processes. This distinction clarifies why 'Factual' is not a recognized type of evidence in the framework of

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy